Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gifford, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, D. J., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Gifford, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 2, 187-200 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167201272005
© 2001 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

The Sounds and Sights of Intelligence: A Lens Model Channel Analysis

D’Arcy J. Reynolds, Jr.

University of Victoria

Robert Gifford

University of Victoria, rgifford{at}uvic.ca

The links between 13 auditory and visual behavioral cues, measured intelligence, and observer judgments of intelligence in a zero-acquaintance context were examined in a lens model study. Auditory-plus-visual, auditory-only, and visual-only information conditions, in addition to a transcript-only control condition, were employed to determine whether auditory or visual cues encode measured intelligence more strongly and which are used more in judgments of intelligence. Five cues (of both types) accounted for nearly half the variance in measured intelligence, but it was much more strongly associated with auditory than visual cues. Observers’ judgments of intelligence were also much more strongly related to auditory than visual cues. Visual cues may even depress accuracy; accuracy was higher in an auditory-only condition than in an auditory-plus-visual condition.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
N. A. Murphy
Appearing Smart: The Impression Management of Intelligence, Person Perception Accuracy, and Behavior in Social Interaction
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2007; 33(3): 325 - 339.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. A. Zebrowitz, J. A. Hall, N. A. Murphy, and G. Rhodes
Looking Smart and Looking Good: Facial Cues to Intelligence and their Origins
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 2002; 28(2): 238 - 249.
[Abstract] [PDF]