Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SPSP Annual Meeting 2010

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Betsch, T.
Right arrow Articles by Gütig, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Betsch, T.
Right arrow Articles by Gütig, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

I Like it but I Don’t Know Why: A Value-Account Approach to Implicit Attitude Formation

Tilmann Betsch

University of Heidelberg, Germany, tilmann_betsch{at}psi-sv2.psi.uni-heidelberg.de

Henning Plessner

University of Heidelberg, Germany

Christiane Schwieren

University of Maastricht, the Netherlands

Robert Gütig

University of Freiburg, Germany

The authors suggest a theory that predicts how summary evaluations about targets are implicitly formed and stored in memory and under which conditions they are used in attitude judgment. First, it is assumed that the mere encoding of value-charged stimuli is a sufficient condition to initiate implicit online formation of summary evaluations. Second, the authors claim that this process is summative. Accordingly, the intensities of the positive or negative responses evoked by the stimuli in the organism are thought to be accumulated and stored in a unitary memory structure. This hypothetical structure is called value account. Third, it is assumed that a value account is more easily accessible in memory than are concrete traces of past experiences. Therefore, attitude judgments should rely on value accounts, especially if cognitive capacities are constrained (e.g., due to time pressure). Three experiments that provide converging evidence for the value-account approach are reported.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 2, 242-253 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167201272009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
F. Van Overwalle and F. Siebler
A Connectionist Model of Attitude Formation and Change
Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2005; 9(3): 231 - 274.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
F. Van Overwalle and C. Labiouse
A Recurrent Connectionist Model of Person Impression Formation
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2004; 8(1): 28 - 61.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. R. Eiser, R. H. Fazio, T. Stafford, and T. J. Prescott
Connectionist Simulation of Attitude Learning: Asymmetries in the Acquisition of Positive and Negative Evaluations
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2003; 29(10): 1221 - 1235.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
F. van Overwalle and K. Jordens
An Adaptive Connectionist Model of Cognitive Dissonance
Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2002; 6(3): 204 - 231.
[Abstract] [PDF]