Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Esses, V. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Esses, V. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 3, 321-331 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167201273006
© 2001 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Attributions of Responsibility and Reactions to Affirmative Action: Affirmative Action as Help

Kimberly A. Quinn

The University of Western Ontario, kquinn{at}northwestern.edu

Erin M. Ross

The University of Western Ontario

Victoria M. Esses

The University of Western Ontario

The authors investigated the relation between attributions of responsibility and reactions to affirmative action. Participants read one of four fictitious editorials about visible minority under-employment in which responsibility for causing the underemployment problem and responsibility for solving it were manipulated. Results indicated that ratings and endorsement of affirmative action programs, and perceptions that affirmative action promotes relevant values, were highest when visible minorities were depicted as responsible for either the cause of the problem or its solution, but not both. That is, reactions to affirmative action were influenced by the interplay of attributions of responsibility for causing the problem and attributions of responsibility for providing a solution. The results of this experiment suggest that the framing of beneficiaries of affirmative action in terms of responsibility for causing and solving the problem of their disadvantage is an important determinant of reactions to affirmative action programs.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. D. Richardson
Switching Social Identities:: The Influence of Editorial Framing on Reader Attitudes Toward Affirmative Action and African Americans
Communication Research, August 1, 2005; 32(4): 503 - 528.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
R. Shirazi and A. Biel
Internal-External Causal Attributions and Perceived Government Responsibility for Need Provision: A 14-Culture Study
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, January 1, 2005; 36(1): 96 - 116.
[Abstract] [PDF]