Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Corneille, O.
Right arrow Articles by Buidin, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Corneille, O.
Right arrow Articles by Buidin, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 4, 437-446 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167201274005
© 2001 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Threat and the Group Attribution Error: When Threat Elicits Judgments of Extremity and Homogeneity

Olivier Corneille

Catholic University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, and Belgian National Fund of Scientific Research, corneille{at}upso.ucl.ac.be

Vincent Y. Yzerbyt

Catholic University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve

Anouk Rogier

Catholic University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, and Belgian National Fund of Scientific Research

Geneviève Buidin

Catholic University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve

In two studies, the authors investigated the impact of threat on the perception of extremity and homogeneity among the members of a group. They relied on the Group Attribution Error paradigm and asked participants to estimate the attitudes in a group of voters. Depending on the condition, the decision rules were such that the proposition allegedly passed or failed. The degree of threat of the group was varied by informing participants that the group represented a small (4%) or substantial (40%) proportion of the population living in the area. Consistent with the Group Attribution Error literature, the outcome of the vote influenced participants’ inferences about the extremity of the voters’ attitude. More positive (negative) attitudes were inferred in the case of a positive (negative) outcome of the vote. This effect was qualified by the level of threat. Participants inferred relatively more extreme and more homogeneous attitudes among the members of a threatening group.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
M. Hewstone, R. J. Crisp, A. Contarello, A. Voci, L. Conway, G. Marletta, and H. Willis
Tokens in the Tower: Perceptual Processes and Interaction Dynamics in Academic Settings with 'Skewed', 'Tilted' and 'Balanced' Sex Ratios
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2006; 9(4): 509 - 532.
[Abstract] [PDF]