Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richard, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Stokes-Zoota, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Richard, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Stokes-Zoota, J. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 4, 497-505 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167201274010
© 2001 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

"That’s Completely Obvious... and Important": Lay Judgments of Social Psychological Findings

F. D. Richard

Texas Christian University

Charles F. Bond, Jr.

Texas Christian University, c.bond{at}tcu.edu

Juli J. Stokes-Zoota

Texas Christian University

Many social psychologists believe that if research results are obvious, they are unimportant and uninteresting. The current study evaluated lay perceptions of social psychological research findings. Results from three studies reveal differences between lay evaluations of research and scientific evaluations. In Study 1, students with no prior exposure to social psychology judge the most obvious research findings to be the most important. In Study 2, students can predict findings, and the most predictable findings are judged most important. In Study 3, students judge the most obvious findings to be most important to establish with research. Results address the accuracy of lay judgments of research, judgmental strategies, and the process by which social psychologists select research topics.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Environment and BehaviorHome page
J. Rotton and E. G. Cohn
Global Warming and U.S. Crime Rates: An Application of Routine Activity Theory
Environment and Behavior, November 1, 2003; 35(6): 802 - 825.
[Abstract] [PDF]