|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 5,
526-537 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167201275002
© 2001 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
Knowing Me, Knowing You: Anonymity Effects on Social Identity Processes within Groups
Martin Lea
University of Manchester, martin.lea{at}man.ac.uk
Russell Spears
University of Amsterdam
Daphne de Groot
University of Amsterdam
The Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Effects (SIDE) proposes that depersonalization of self and others is responsible for the effects of visual anonymity on group behavior. The authors investigated these mediating processes by assessing the effects of group-based self-categorization and stereotyping of others on group attraction within visually anonymous or video-identifiable groups communicating via computer. Structural equation modeling showed that visual anonymity increased group-based self-categorization, which directly increased attraction to the group and indirectly increased group attraction by enhancing group-based stereotyping of others. Visual anonymity had no effect on self-categorization in terms of a wider social category (nationality). Predictions derived from alternative perspectives that visual anonymity decreases group attraction by increasing impersonal task focus or by attenuating evaluation concerns were not supported.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. S. Ho and D. M. McLeod
Social-Psychological Influences on Opinion Expression in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Communication
Communication Research,
April 1, 2008;
35(2):
190 - 207.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. W. Rockmann, M. G. Pratt, and G. B. Northcraft
Divided Loyalties: Determinants of Identification in Interorganizational Teams
Small Group Research,
December 1, 2007;
38(6):
727 - 751.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E.-J. Lee
When and How Does Depersonalization Increase Conformity to Group Norms in Computer-Mediated Communication?
Communication Research,
December 1, 2006;
33(6):
423 - 447.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. R. Scott and S. A. Rains
Anonymous Communication in Organizations: Assessing Use and Appropriateness
Management Communication Quarterly,
November 1, 2005;
19(2):
157 - 197.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Sassenberg and M. Boos
Attitude Change in Computer-Mediated Communication: Effects of Anonymity and Category Norms
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
October 1, 2003;
6(4):
405 - 422.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Brunsting and T. Postmes
Social Movement Participation in the Digital Age: Predicting Offline and Online Collective Action
Small Group Research,
October 1, 2002;
33(5):
525 - 554.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Spears, M. Lea, R. A. Corneliussen, T. Postmes, and W. T. Haar
Computer-Mediated Communication as a Channel for Social Resistance: The Strategic Side of SIDE
Small Group Research,
October 1, 2002;
33(5):
555 - 574.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Postmes and R. Spears
Behavior Online: Does Anonymous Computer Communication Reduce Gender Inequality?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
August 1, 2002;
28(8):
1073 - 1083.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|