Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fazio, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Hilden, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fazio, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Hilden, L. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 5, 538-549 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167201275003
© 2001 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Emotional Reactions to a Seemingly Prejudiced Response: The Role of Automatically Activated Racial Attitudes and Motivation to Control Prejudiced Reactions

Russell H. Fazio

Indiana University, fazio{at}indiana.edu

Laura E. Hilden

Indiana University

This study examined emotional reactions to a televised public service ad regarding racial prejudice. The ad induces viewers to draw a seemingly prejudicial inference about an African American man. Emotional reactions to the ad varied as a function of automatically activated racial attitudes and the two factors of the Motivation to Control Prejudiced Reactions Scale, all of which were assessed 3 months prior to exposure to the ad. More positive racial attitudes were associated with feelings of guilt in response to the ad. Individuals with higher scores on the concern with Acting Prejudiced factor of the motivation scale reported both greater guilt and greater agitation, whereas those with higher scores on the Restraint to Avoid Dispute factor experienced agitation but not guilt. The implications of the findings for prejudice reduction efforts and the effectiveness of the public service ad as a social influence strategy are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. J. Ratcliff, G. D. Lassiter, K. D. Markman, and C. J. Snyder
Gender differences in attitudes toward gay men and lesbians: the role of motivation to respond without prejudice.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2006; 32(10): 1325 - 1338.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. A. Olson and R. H. Fazio
Reducing Automatically Activated Racial Prejudice Through Implicit Evaluative Conditioning
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 2006; 32(4): 421 - 433.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
D. A. Saucier, C. T. Miller, and N. Doucet
Differences in Helping Whites and Blacks: A Meta-Analysis
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2005; 9(1): 2 - 16.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
T. Towles-Schwen and R. H. Fazio
Choosing Social Situations: The Relation Between Automatically Activated Racial Attitudes and Anticipated Comfort Interacting With African Americans
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 2003; 29(2): 170 - 182.
[Abstract] [PDF]