Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weary, G.
Right arrow Articles by Reich, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Weary, G.
Right arrow Articles by Reich, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 5, 562-574 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167201275005
© 2001 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Attributional Effects of Conflicting Chronic and Temporary Outcome Expectancies: A Case of Automatic Comparison and Contrast

Gifford Weary

Ohio State University, weary.1{at}osu.edu

Darcy A. Reich

Ohio State University, reich.16{at}osu.edu

Two studies examined the notion that perceivers’ chronically accessible, negative future-event expectancies might serve as an important cognitive context for the interpretation of temporarily primed expectancies. Such a cognitive context should activate more extreme event-outcome categories that subsequently should be used as comparison standards in the dispositional inference process. A final study examined the direct effect of chronically accessible, negative expectancies on judgments of the priming stimuli. The results of all three studies support the notion that the contextually produced extremity of momentary event expectancies resulted in an unaware and highly efficient comparison and contrast process. When participants were aware of the activation of extreme event-outcome categories and had the requisite resources, correction of target judgments occurred.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. A. Reich and R. D. Mather
Busy Perceivers and Ineffective Suppression Goals: A Critical Role for Distracter Thoughts
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2008; 34(5): 706 - 718.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
J. Decoster and H. M. Claypool
A Meta-Analysis of Priming Effects on Impression Formation Supporting a General Model of Informational Biases
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2004; 8(1): 2 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. J. Tobin and G. Weary
An On-Line Look at Automatic Contrast and Correction of Behavior Categorizations and Dispositional Inferences
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2003; 29(10): 1328 - 1338.
[Abstract] [PDF]