Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krueger, J.
Right arrow Articles by Stanke, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Krueger, J.
Right arrow Articles by Stanke, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Role of Self-Referent and Other-Referent Knowledge in Perceptions of Group Characteristics

Joachim Krueger

Brown University, Joachim_Krueger{at}Brown.edu

David Stanke

Brown University

Research on social projection shows that perceptions of group characteristics depend, in part, on people’s perceptions of themselves. According to the principles of inductive reasoning, however, knowledge of other individual group members should also predict perceptions of the group. The present studies directly compared the use of self- and other-referent knowledge. In Study 1, self-judgments predicted group judgments better than judgments about a familiar other person did. When differences in the accessibility and stability of self-referent and other-referent knowledge were controlled, the predictive advantage of self-referent knowledge disappeared. In Study 2, the other person was present during assessment (i.e., visually salient) and other judgments predicted group judgments as well as self-judgments did. Changes in social categorization, however, instead of increases in the individuation of the other person accounted for this finding. It is concluded that projection is best understood as an egocentric bias rather than a form of inductive reasoning.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 7, 878-888 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167201277010


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
J. M. Robbins and J. I. Krueger
Social Projection to Ingroups and Outgroups: A Review and Meta-Analysis
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2005; 9(1): 32 - 47.
[Abstract] [PDF]