Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Madon, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jussim, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Madon, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jussim, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 8, 996-1010 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167201278007
© 2001 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Ethnic and National Stereotypes: The Princeton Trilogy Revisited and Revised

Stephanie Madon

Iowa State University, madon{at}iastate.edu

Max Guyll

Iowa State University

Kathy Aboufadel

Rutgers University

Eulices Montiel

Rutgers University

Alison Smith

Rutgers University

Polly Palumbo

Rutgers University

Lee Jussim

Rutgers University

Three studies assessed changes in the content, consensus, and favorableness of 10 ethnic and national stereotypes by replicating and extending the Princeton trilogy. Results indicated that throughout the past 60 years, almost all of the ethnic and national stereotypes that were examined had changed in content, and more than half had changed in consensus. Most changes in consensus reflected increases rather than decreases, suggesting that modern members of stereotyped groups may confront stereotypes more frequently than did previous members of stereotyped groups. However, the damaging effects that consensual stereotypes can have on members of these groups may be tempered by the finding that most of the stereotypes became more favorable. These results are discussed in terms of changing social roles, intergroup contact, and stereotype accuracy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
A. Terracciano and R. R. McCrae
Perceptions of Americans and the Iraq Invasion: Implications for Understanding National Character Stereotypes
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, November 1, 2007; 38(6): 695 - 710.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Black StudiesHome page
E. A. Golebiowska
The Contours and Etiology of Whites' Attitudes Toward Black-White Interracial Marriage1
Journal of Black Studies, November 1, 2007; 38(2): 268 - 287.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
A. Terracciano, A. M. Abdel-Khalek, N. Adam, L. Adamovova, C.-k. Ahn, H.-n. Ahn, B. M. Alansari, L. Alcalay, J. Allik, A. Angleitner, et al.
National Character Does Not Reflect Mean Personality Trait Levels in 49 Cultures
Science, October 7, 2005; 310(5745): 96 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]