Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Onishi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Block, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Onishi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Block, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 9, 1097-1110 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167201279003
© 2001 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Personality Implications of Romantic Attachment Patterns in Young Adults: A Multi-Method, Multi-Informant Study

Miyoko Onishi

University of California, Santa Cruz, m-onishi{at}xb3.so-net.ne.jp

Per F. Gjerde

University of California, Santa Cruz, gjerde{at}cats.ucsc.edu

Jack Block

University of California, Berkeley

A prototype-matching approach was employed to assess romantic attachment in young adults. The 48-item Hazan and Shaver’s Experiences in Close Relationships inventory was configured, via prototype definitions, to capture core themes of four romantic attachment patterns: secure, preoccupied, dismissing, and fearful. The personality attributes associated with each attachment pattern were evaluated by referencing both observer evaluations and self-report correlates. The observer evaluations of the individuals matching the secure, preoccupied, and fearful prototypes were mostly congruent with their self-perceptions, whereas somewhat greater discrepancy emerged for individuals matching the dismissing prototype. The discussion focused on differences in the personality functioning associated with different romantic attachment patterns, the prototype-matching method, the importance of including both observer- and self-report data in the validation of self-report measures, and the relative advantages of self-report versus interview methodologies in studying attachment.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
P. F. Gjerde, M. Onishi, and K. S. Carlson
Personality Characteristics Associated With Romantic Attachment: A Comparison of Interview and Self-Report Methodologies
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2004; 30(11): 1402 - 1415.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. C. Fraley and G. A. Bonanno
Attachment and Loss: A Test of Three Competing Models on the Association between Attachment-Related Avoidance and Adaptation to Bereavement
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2004; 30(7): 878 - 890.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. C. Weir and P. F. Gjerde
Preschool Personality Prototypes: Internal Coherence, Cross-Study Replicability, and Developmental Outcomes in Adolescence
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2002; 28(9): 1229 - 1241.
[Abstract] [PDF]