Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hassebrauck, M.
Right arrow Articles by Aron, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hassebrauck, M.
Right arrow Articles by Aron, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Prototype Matching in Close Relationships

Manfred Hassebrauck

Bergische Universität Wuppertal, hassebrauck{at}uni-wuppertal.de

Arthur Aron

State University of New York at Stony Brook

Four studies tested the prototype-matching model that people use the prototype of a good relationship to evaluate the quality of concrete relationships. In Study 1, distance from the consensual prototype of participants’ descriptions of the features of their relationship strongly predicted relationship quality, and this prediction was significantly stronger for distance from central (vs. peripheral) features. Study 2 replicated these results and also found no significant advantage for predicting relationship quality using a relationship’s distance from idiosyncratically weighted (vs. consensually weighted) centrality of prototype features. Study 3 experimentally manipulated a described relation-ship’s distance from the prototype and found that distance from central features affected relationship evaluations more than distance from peripheral or intermediate features. Study 4 experimentally manipulated the prototype of relationship quality itself and found that correlations of relationship quality with matches with the prototype were more strongly influenced by those features that were increased in their importance.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 9, 1111-1122 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167201279004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
Shuangyue Zhang and S. L. Kline
Can I Make my Own Decision? A Cross-Cultural Study of Perceived Social Network Influence in Mate Selection
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, January 1, 2009; 40(1): 3 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
C. J. Lutz-Zois, A. C. Bradley, J. L. Mihalik, and E. R. Moorman-Eavers
Perceived similarity and relationship success among dating couples: An idiographic approach
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, December 1, 2006; 23(6): 865 - 880.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
G. Robins and J. Boldero
Relational Discrepancy Theory: The Implications of Self-Discrepancy Theory for Dyadic Relationships and for the Emergence of Social Structure
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2003; 7(1): 56 - 74.
[Abstract] [PDF]