Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gagné, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lydon, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gagné, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lydon, J. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 9, 1144-1155 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167201279007
© 2001 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Mindset and Relationship Illusions: The Moderating Effects of Domain Specificity and Relationship Commitment

Faby M. Gagné

McGill University, faby{at}ego.psych.mcgill.ca

John E. Lydon

McGill University

Two studies integrated and advanced mindset and relationship illusions research. In Study 1, mindset influenced perceived partner superiority and goal domain moderated this effect. When focusing on a nonrelationship goal, an implemental mindset increased idealistic partner perceptions. When focusing on a relationship goal, a deliberative mindset increased idealistic partner perceptions. In Study 2, effects for mindset about relationship goals were moderated by relationship commitment. High-commitment participants defended against the threat of a deliberative mindset by increasing their positive views of their partner. Low-commitment participants did not defend against deliberation about a relationship goal. No such differences were found for relationship implementals; both high- and low-commitment individuals increased their glowing partner views when in an implemental mindset.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. Campbell, S. D. Lackenbauer, and A. Muise
When Is Being Known or Adored by Romantic Partners Most Beneficial? Self-Perceptions, Relationship Length, and Responses to Partner's Verifying and Enhancing Appraisals.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2006; 32(10): 1283 - 1294.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
F. M. Gagne and J. E. Lydon
Bias and Accuracy in Close Relationships: An Integrative Review
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2004; 8(4): 322 - 338.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
F. M. Gagne and J. E. Lydon
Identification and the Commitment Shift: Accounting for Gender Differences in Relationship Illusions
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2003; 29(7): 907 - 919.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. E. Lydon, G. M. Fitzsimons, and L. Naidoo
Devaluation Versus Enhancement of Attractive Alternatives: A Critical Test Using the Calibration Paradigm
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2003; 29(3): 349 - 359.
[Abstract] [PDF]