Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SPSP Annual Meeting 2010

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Struch, N.
Right arrow Articles by van der Kloot, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Struch, N.
Right arrow Articles by van der Kloot, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Meanings of Basic Values for Women and Men: A Cross-Cultural Analysis

Naomi Struch

The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, naomiS{at}jdc.org.il

Shalom H. Schwartz

The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, msshasch{at}mscc.huji.ac.il

Willem A. van der Kloot

Leiden University

Do men and women construe basic values in the same way? The authors investigate possible gender differences in value meaning at three levels: 2 dimensions that organize value systems, 10 motivationally distinct values, and 45 value items. They assess differences across and within diverse cultures and perform multidimensional scaling analysis (MDS) and Procrustes analyses on responses to a value survey by 11,244 respondents in eight cultural regions (Chinese East Asia, Eastern Europe, Finland, France, Israel, Japan, Latin America, and the United States). Statistical fit indices and inspection of graphic representations reveal neither cross-culturally consistent gender effects on value meaning nor Gender x Culture interactions. The implications of these findings for theories of gender effects and for the cross-cultural study of gender differences in value importance are discussed.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 1, 16-28 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167202281002
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Hum LactHome page
R. Osbaldiston and L. A. Mingle
Characterization of Human Milk Donors
J Hum Lact, November 1, 2007; 23(4): 350 - 357.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. C. Cohrs, B. Moschner, J. Maes, and S. Kielmann
The Motivational Bases of Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation: Relations to Values and Attitudes in the Aftermath of September 11, 2001
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2005; 31(10): 1425 - 1434.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 European Journal of CommunicationHome page
P. Vyncke
Lifestyle Segmentation: From Attitudes, Interests and Opinions, to Values, Aesthetic Styles, Life Visions and Media Preferences
European Journal of Communication, December 1, 2002; 17(4): 445 - 463.
[Abstract] [PDF]