Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SPSP Annual Meeting 2010

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pliner, P.
Right arrow Articles by Martins, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pliner, P.
Right arrow Articles by Martins, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Effects of Meal Cues and Amount Consumed on Predictions of Future Eating in Others

Patricia Pliner

University of Toronto at Mississauga, pliner{at}psych.utoronto.ca

Yolanda Martins

Monell Chemical Senses Center

In Study 1, participants watched one of four videotapes of a target person who was eating; two independent variables were manipulated. The first involved the presence/absence of various behaviors associated with meals (e.g., using utensils, sitting to eat).The second varied the amount of food eaten. After viewing their assigned videotapes, participants provided an open-ended description of what was happening in the videotape and rated the likelihood of the target engaging in a number of behaviors within several time frames. Results showed that when the target person engaged in behaviors usually associated with meals, she was more likely to be spontaneously described as eating a meal and was rated as less likely to eat/feel hungry in the next 2 hours than when meal-associated behaviors were absent. Amount con sumed had no effect on the dependent variables. Studies 2 and 3 successfully ruled out some alternative explanations for the Study 1 results.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 10, 1354-1365 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/014616702236867


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?