Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SPSP Annual Meeting 2010

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holland, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by van Vugt, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Holland, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by van Vugt, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Dissonance on the Road: Self-Esteem as a Moderator of Internal and External Self-Justification Strategies

Rob W. Holland

University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands, r.holland{at}psych.kun.nl

Ree M. Meertens

Maastricht University, the Netherlands

Mark van Vugt

University of Southampton, United Kingdom

Processes of self-justification were investigated in a field experiment among car drivers. High self-esteem was expected to reduce internal and external self-justification strategies. Dissonance was aroused by confronting respondents with the negative consequences of car driving either for others, that is, moral dissonance (e.g., environment, public health), or for themselves, that is, hedonistic dissonance (e.g., travel time). A third group served as a no-dissonance control group. Consistent with the predictions, no self-justification was found among high-self-esteem respondents. Low-self-esteem respondents displayed more external self-justification strategies in response to moral dissonance and internal self-justification strategies in response to hedonistic dissonance, although the latter effect was weaker. Results of Study 2 suggest that high-self-esteem respondents are less likely to engage in self-justification because they experience less discomfort after a self-threat. Together, the results illuminate the relation between self-esteem and self-justification and provide external validity for self-affirmation theory.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 12, 1713-1724 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/014616702237652


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Compensation Benefits ReviewHome page
S. A. Jeffrey and V. Shaffer
The Motivational Properties of Tangible Incentives
Compensation Benefits Review, June 1, 2007; 39(3): 44 - 50.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
G. R. Maio and G. Thomas
The Epistemic-Teleologic Model of Deliberate Self-Persuasion
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2007; 11(1): 46 - 67.
[Abstract] [PDF]