This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Pronin, E. Articles by Ross, L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Pronin, E. Articles by Ross, L. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Bias Blind Spot: Perceptions of Bias in Self Versus Others

Stanford University, pronin{at}wjh.harvard.edu

Daniel Y. Lin

Stanford University

Lee Ross

Stanford University

Three studies suggest that individuals see the existence and operation of cognitive and motivational biases much more in others than in themselves. Study 1 provides evidence from three surveys that people rate themselves as less subject to various biases than the "average American," classmates in a seminar, and fellow airport travelers. Data from the third survey further suggest that such claims arise from the interplay among availability biases and self-enhancement motives. Participants in one follow-up study who showed the better-than-average bias insisted that their self-assessments were accurate and objective even after reading a description of how they could have been affected by the relevant bias. Participants in a final study reported their peer’s self-serving attributions regarding test performance to be biased but their own similarly self-serving attributions to be free of bias. The relevance of these phenomena to naïve realism and to conflict, misunderstanding, and dispute resolution is discussed.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 3, 369-381 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167202286008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Tadajewski The Debate That Won't Die? Values Incommensurability, Antagonism and Theory Choice Organization, July 1, 2009; 16(4): 467 - 485. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. Tobin Cognitive bias and the poetics of surprise Language and Literature, May 1, 2009; 18(2): 155 - 172. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Tadajewski Incommensurable paradigms, cognitive bias and the politics of marketing theory Marketing Theory, September 1, 2008; 8(3): 273 - 297. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. A. Vandello, D. Cohen, and S. Ransom U.S. Southern and Northern Differences in Perceptions of Norms About Aggression: Mechanisms for the Perpetuation of a Culture of Honor Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, March 1, 2008; 39(2): 162 - 177. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. R. Sommers and M. I. Norton Lay Theories About White Racists: What Constitutes Racism (and What Doesn't) Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 2006; 9(1): 117 - 138. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. D. Reeder, J. B. Pryor, M. J. A. Wohl, and M. L. Griswell On Attributing Negative Motives to Others Who Disagree With Our Opinions Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2005; 31(11): 1498 - 1510. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Ehrlinger, T. Gilovich, and L. Ross Peering Into the Bias Blind Spot: People's Assessments of Bias in Themselves and Others Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2005; 31(5): 680 - 692. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. O'Sullivan The Fundamental Attribution Error in Detecting Deception: The Boy-Who-Cried-Wolf Effect Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2003; 29(10): 1316 - 1327. [Abstract] [PDF]