Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pronin, E.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pronin, E.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 3, 369-381 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167202286008
© 2002 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

The Bias Blind Spot: Perceptions of Bias in Self Versus Others

Emily Pronin

Stanford University, pronin{at}wjh.harvard.edu

Daniel Y. Lin

Stanford University

Lee Ross

Stanford University

Three studies suggest that individuals see the existence and operation of cognitive and motivational biases much more in others than in themselves. Study 1 provides evidence from three surveys that people rate themselves as less subject to various biases than the "average American," classmates in a seminar, and fellow airport travelers. Data from the third survey further suggest that such claims arise from the interplay among availability biases and self-enhancement motives. Participants in one follow-up study who showed the better-than-average bias insisted that their self-assessments were accurate and objective even after reading a description of how they could have been affected by the relevant bias. Participants in a final study reported their peer’s self-serving attributions regarding test performance to be biased but their own similarly self-serving attributions to be free of bias. The relevance of these phenomena to naïve realism and to conflict, misunderstanding, and dispute resolution is discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
J. A. Vandello, D. Cohen, and S. Ransom
U.S. Southern and Northern Differences in Perceptions of Norms About Aggression: Mechanisms for the Perpetuation of a Culture of Honor
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, March 1, 2008; 39(2): 162 - 177.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
S. T. Moulton and S. M. Kosslyn
Using neuroimaging to resolve the psi debate.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., January 1, 2008; 20(1): 182 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
S. R. Sommers and M. I. Norton
Lay Theories About White Racists: What Constitutes Racism (and What Doesn't)
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 2006; 9(1): 117 - 138.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
G. D. Reeder, J. B. Pryor, M. J. A. Wohl, and M. L. Griswell
On Attributing Negative Motives to Others Who Disagree With Our Opinions
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2005; 31(11): 1498 - 1510.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. Ehrlinger, T. Gilovich, and L. Ross
Peering Into the Bias Blind Spot: People's Assessments of Bias in Themselves and Others
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2005; 31(5): 680 - 692.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. O'Sullivan
The Fundamental Attribution Error in Detecting Deception: The Boy-Who-Cried-Wolf Effect
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2003; 29(10): 1316 - 1327.
[Abstract] [PDF]