This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Anderson, D. E. Articles by Ansfield, M. E. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Anderson, D. E. Articles by Ansfield, M. E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Development of Deception Detection Skill: A Longitudinal Study of Same-Sex Friends

University of Virginia, eric{at}unifex.dyndns.org

Bella M. DePaulo

University of Virginia, bmd{at}virginia.edu

Matthew E. Ansfield

Lawrence University

One member of each of 52 pairs of friends told true and fabricated stories to a partner (the judge) who guessed whether each story was true. This procedure was followed when the friends had known each other for 1 month and again 5 months later. Across all of the pairs, accuracy at detecting deception did not improve over time. However, judges from the emotionally closer pairs did become more accurate at 6 months than they had been at 1 month. The judges from the less-close pairs instead became less inclined to regard the stories as truthful, especially when they actually were truthful. Results of a second study ruled out the alternative interpretation that the closer friends told stories that were more obviously truthful or deceptive at 6 months than they had at 1 month. On indirect measures of deception detection, all of the groups of judges could distinguish the truths from the lies.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 4, 536-545 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167202287010


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?