Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pickett, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Brewer, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pickett, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Brewer, M. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Impact of Assimilation and Differentiation Needs on Perceived Group Importance and Judgments of Ingroup Size

Cynthia L. Pickett

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, cpickett{at}uiuc.edu

Michael D. Silver

Ohio State University

Marilynn B. Brewer

Ohio State University

At the heart of optimal distinctiveness theory is the idea that a group’s level of inclusiveness is a significant determinant of how well that group can meet members’ needs for assimilation and differentiation. In two studies, this principle was demonstrated by experimentally manipulating both needs and examining their effects on perceptions of ingroup size and on the perceived importance of ingroups that vary in level of inclusiveness. It was predicted that assimilation need would lead to a preference for inclusive ingroups and the tendency to overestimate ingroup size, whereas differentiation need would lead to a preference for exclusive ingroups and the tendency to underestimate ingroup size. Support for these predictions was found across both studies. The results support the hypothesis that the arousal of assimilation and differentiation needs interacts with ingroup inclusiveness to determine optimal social identities.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 4, 546-558 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167202287011


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
D. Abrams
Social Identity on a National Scale: Optimal Distinctiveness and Young People's Self-Expression Through Musical Preference
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, May 1, 2009; 12(3): 303 - 317.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. E. Glasford, J. F. Dovidio, and F. Pratto
I Continue to Feel So Good About Us: In-Group Identification and the Use of Social Identity--Enhancing Strategies to Reduce Intragroup Dissonance
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 2009; 35(4): 415 - 427.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. Imhoff and H.-P. Erb
What Motivates Nonconformity? Uniqueness Seeking Blocks Majority Influence
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2009; 35(3): 309 - 320.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
A. Gomez, J. F. Dovidio, C. Huici, S. L. Gaertner, and I. Cuadrado
The Other Side of We: When Outgroup Members Express Common Identity
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2008; 34(12): 1613 - 1626.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. P. Brown, M. J. A. Wohl, and J. J. Exline
Taking Up Offenses: Secondhand Forgiveness and Group Identification
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2008; 34(10): 1406 - 1419.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. L. Knowles and W. L. Gardner
Benefits of Membership: The Activation and Amplification of Group Identities in Response to Social Rejection
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2008; 34(9): 1200 - 1213.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
S. Roccas, L. Sagiv, S. Schwartz, N. Halevy, and R. Eidelson
Toward a Unifying Model of Identification With Groups: Integrating Theoretical Perspectives
Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2008; 12(3): 280 - 306.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Environment and BehaviorHome page
D. T. Ory, P. L. Mokhtarian, and G. O. Collantes
Exploring the Cognitive and Affective Mechanisms Behind Subjective Assessments of Travel Amounts
Environment and Behavior, July 1, 2007; 39(4): 494 - 528.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
B. Sahdra and M. Ross
Group Identification and Historical Memory
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2007; 33(3): 384 - 395.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
M. J. Hornsey and J. Jetten
The Individual Within the Group: Balancing the Need to Belong With the Need to Be Different
Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2004; 8(3): 248 - 264.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. Y. Shah, P. C. Brazy, and E. T. Higgins
Promoting Us or Preventing Them: Regulatory Focus and Manifestations of Intergroup Bias
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 2004; 30(4): 433 - 446.
[Abstract] [PDF]