Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harmon-Jones, E.
Right arrow Articles by Harmon-Jones, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Harmon-Jones, E.
Right arrow Articles by Harmon-Jones, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 6, 711-723 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167202289001
© 2002 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Testing the Action-Based Model of Cognitive Dissonance: The Effect of Action Orientation on Postdecisional Attitudes

Eddie Harmon-Jones

University of Wisconsin-Madison, eharmonj{at}facstaff.wisc.edu

Cindy Harmon-Jones

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Two experiments were designed to test the prediction, derived from the action-based model of cognitive dissonance, that facilitation of an action-oriented mindset would increase cognitive discrepancy reduction. In Experiment 1, following an easy or difficult decision, a manipulated action-oriented mindset (thinking about implementing the decision) caused persons who made a difficult decision to change their evaluations of the decision alternatives in favor of the decision (spreading of alternatives) more than other participants. Experiment 2 conceptually replicated the effects of Experiment 1, even when an action orientation was induced by having persons write about implementing a different decision. Discussion focuses on the implications of these findings.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
A. Guinote
Power and Goal Pursuit
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2007; 33(8): 1076 - 1087.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
C. J. Armitage and M. A. Arden
Felt and Potential Ambivalence across the Stages of Change
J Health Psychol, January 1, 2007; 12(1): 149 - 158.
[Abstract] [PDF]