Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Postmes, T.
Right arrow Articles by Spears, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Postmes, T.
Right arrow Articles by Spears, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Behavior Online: Does Anonymous Computer Communication Reduce Gender Inequality?

Tom Postmes

University of Exeter, University of Amsterdam, t.postmes{at}ex.ac.uk

Russell Spears

University of Amsterdam

Two studies examined dominance and self-stereotyping in mixed-sex groups who had online discussions. Gender differences in dominance varied as a function of several contextual variables: individuation, the accessibility of gender stereotypes, and the fit between group task and stereotype. Results of the second study indicate that only when group members are depersonalized (anonymous and not individuated) does stereotype activation produce gender-stereotypic behavior. However, the nature of stereotypic behavior is moderated by the fit between group task and stereotypes, such that men dominate when the topic is masculine but not when it is feminine. These findings do not support suggestions that the anonymity offered by online communication would lead to equalization. Instead, results confirm predictions from a social identity model of deindividuation effects that social effects of anonymity and identifiability in (online) groups depend on contextual factors such as stereotype accessibility and fit.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 8, 1073-1083 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672022811006
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
N. A. Palomares
Women Are Sort of More Tentative Than Men, Aren't They?: How Men and Women Use Tentative Language Differently, Similarly, and Counterstereotypically as a Function of Gender Salience
Communication Research, August 1, 2009; 36(4): 538 - 560.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
E.-J. Lee
When Are Strong Arguments Stronger Than Weak Arguments?: Deindividuation Effects on Message Elaboration in Computer-Mediated Communication
Communication Research, October 1, 2008; 35(5): 646 - 665.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Small Group ResearchHome page
K. W. Rockmann, M. G. Pratt, and G. B. Northcraft
Divided Loyalties: Determinants of Identification in Interorganizational Teams
Small Group Research, December 1, 2007; 38(6): 727 - 751.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
R. Thomson
The Effect of Topic of Discussion on Gendered Language in Computer-Mediated Communication Discussion
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, June 1, 2006; 25(2): 167 - 178.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
E.-J. Lee
When Placebic Information Differs From Real Information: Cognitive and Motivational Bases of Mindful Reactions to Informational Social Influence
Communication Research, October 1, 2005; 32(5): 615 - 645.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 New Media SocietyHome page
P. M. Valkenburg, A. P. Schouten, and J. Peter
Adolescents' identity experiments on the internet
New Media Society, June 1, 2005; 7(3): 383 - 402.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
E.-J. Lee
Effects of the Influence Agent's Sex and Self-Confidence on Informational Social Influence in Computer-Mediated Communication:: Quantitative Versus Verbal Presentation
Communication Research, February 1, 2005; 32(1): 29 - 58.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
A. Barak
Sexual Harassment on the Internet
Social Science Computer Review, February 1, 2005; 23(1): 77 - 92.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
J. A. Green
The Writing on the Stall: Gender and Graffiti
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, September 1, 2003; 22(3): 282 - 296.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Small Group ResearchHome page
R. Spears, M. Lea, R. A. Corneliussen, T. Postmes, and W. T. Haar
Computer-Mediated Communication as a Channel for Social Resistance: The Strategic Side of SIDE
Small Group Research, October 1, 2002; 33(5): 555 - 574.
[Abstract] [PDF]