|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 8,
1073-1083 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672022811006
© 2002 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
Behavior Online: Does Anonymous Computer Communication Reduce Gender Inequality?
Tom Postmes
University of Exeter, University of Amsterdam, t.postmes{at}ex.ac.uk
Russell Spears
University of Amsterdam
Two studies examined dominance and self-stereotyping in mixed-sex groups who had online discussions. Gender differences in dominance varied as a function of several contextual variables: individuation, the accessibility of gender stereotypes, and the fit between group task and stereotype. Results of the second study indicate that only when group members are depersonalized (anonymous and not individuated) does stereotype activation produce gender-stereotypic behavior. However, the nature of stereotypic behavior is moderated by the fit between group task and stereotypes, such that men dominate when the topic is masculine but not when it is feminine. These findings do not support suggestions that the anonymity offered by online communication would lead to equalization. Instead, results confirm predictions from a social identity model of deindividuation effects that social effects of anonymity and identifiability in (online) groups depend on contextual factors such as stereotype accessibility and fit.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. W. Rockmann, M. G. Pratt, and G. B. Northcraft
Divided Loyalties: Determinants of Identification in Interorganizational Teams
Small Group Research,
December 1, 2007;
38(6):
727 - 751.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Thomson
The Effect of Topic of Discussion on Gendered Language in Computer-Mediated Communication Discussion
Journal of Language and Social Psychology,
June 1, 2006;
25(2):
167 - 178.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E.-J. Lee
When Placebic Information Differs From Real Information: Cognitive and Motivational Bases of Mindful Reactions to Informational Social Influence
Communication Research,
October 1, 2005;
32(5):
615 - 645.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. M. Valkenburg, A. P. Schouten, and J. Peter
Adolescents' identity experiments on the internet
New Media Society,
June 1, 2005;
7(3):
383 - 402.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E.-J. Lee
Effects of the Influence Agent's Sex and Self-Confidence on Informational Social Influence in Computer-Mediated Communication:: Quantitative Versus Verbal Presentation
Communication Research,
February 1, 2005;
32(1):
29 - 58.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Barak
Sexual Harassment on the Internet
Social Science Computer Review,
February 1, 2005;
23(1):
77 - 92.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Green
The Writing on the Stall: Gender and Graffiti
Journal of Language and Social Psychology,
September 1, 2003;
22(3):
282 - 296.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Spears, M. Lea, R. A. Corneliussen, T. Postmes, and W. T. Haar
Computer-Mediated Communication as a Channel for Social Resistance: The Strategic Side of SIDE
Small Group Research,
October 1, 2002;
33(5):
555 - 574.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|