Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Erb, H.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Einwiller, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Erb, H.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Einwiller, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Processing Minority and Majority Communications: The Role of Conflict with Prior Attitudes

Hans-Peter Erb

Universität Halle-Wittenberg, hans-peter.erb{at}medizin.uni-halle.de

Gerd Bohner

Universität Bielefeld

Susanne Rank

Systeme, Anwendungen, und Produkte Aktiengesellschaft (SAP AG)

Sabine Einwiller

Universität St. Gallen

The authors studied the effects of recipients’ prior attitudes on message scrutiny in minority and majority influence situations. Based on the objective consensus approach and on conversion theory, the authors derived the hypothesis that cognitive effort dedicated to the processing of minority and majority communications depends on recipients’ prior attitudes. In Experiment 1, prior attitudes were experimentally induced, and in Experiment 2, prior attitudes were measured. Both studies found that majority messages were processed more extensively than minority messages when recipients held a moderate prior attitude. When recipients held an opposing prior attitude, however, the minority message was processed more extensively than the majority message. These findings supported the authors’ predictions and reconciled seemingly contradictory findings in the literature. Theoretical implications as well as avenues for future research are discussed.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 9, 1172-1182 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672022812003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. Imhoff and H.-P. Erb
What Motivates Nonconformity? Uniqueness Seeking Blocks Majority Influence
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2009; 35(3): 309 - 320.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
Z. L. Tormala, V. L. DeSensi, and R. E. Petty
Resisting Persuasion by Illegitimate Means: A Metacognitive Perspective on Minority Influence
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2007; 33(3): 354 - 367.
[Abstract] [PDF]