Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marx, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Roman, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Marx, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Roman, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 9, 1183-1193 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672022812004
© 2002 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Female Role Models: Protecting Women’s Math Test Performance

David M. Marx

Harvard University, dmarx{at}psych.colorado.edu

Jasmin S. Roman

Harvard University

Recent theory and research suggest that certain situational factors can harm women’s math test performance. The three studies presented here indicate that female role models can buffer women’s math test performance from the debilitating effects of these situational factors. In Study 1, women’s math test performance was protected when a competent female experimenter (i.e., a female role model) administered the test. Study 2 showed that it was the perception of the female experimenter’s math competence, not her physical presence, that safeguarded the math test performance of women. Study 3 revealed that learning about a competent female experimenter buffered women’s self-appraised math ability, which in turn led to successful performance on a challenging math test.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
B. Derks, M. Inzlicht, and S. Kang
The Neuroscience of Stigma and Stereotype Threat
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 2008; 11(2): 163 - 181.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
J. R. Shapiro and S. L. Neuberg
From Stereotype Threat to Stereotype Threats: Implications of a Multi-Threat Framework for Causes, Moderators, Mediators, Consequences, and Interventions
Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 2007; 11(2): 107 - 130.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
H. E. S. Rosenthal and R. J. Crisp
Reducing Stereotype Threat by Blurring Intergroup Boundaries
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 2006; 32(4): 501 - 511.
[Abstract] [PDF]