Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kay, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Jost, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kay, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Jost, J. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 9, 1300-1312 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672022812014

Sour Grapes, Sweet Lemons, and the Anticipatory Rationalization of the Status Quo

Aaron C. Kay

Stanford University, aaronk{at}psych.stanford.edu

Maria C. Jimenez

Stanford University

John T. Jost

Stanford University, jost_john{at}gsb.stanford.edu

Integrating theories of cognitive dissonance, system justification, and dynamic thought systems, the authors hypothesized that people would engage in anticipatory rationalization of sociopolitical outcomes for which they were not responsible. In two studies, the authors found that people adjusted their judgments of the desirability of a future event to make them congruent with its perceived likelihood, but only when the event triggered motivational involvement. In Study 1, a political survey administered to 288 Democrats, Republicans, and nonpartisans prior to the Bush-Gore presidential election manipulated the perceived likelihood that each candidate would win and measured the subjective desirability of each outcome. In Study 2, 203 undergraduate students rated the desirability of a large or small tuition increase or decrease that was low, medium, or high in likelihood. Under conditions evoking high motivational involvement, unfavorable as well as favorable outcomes were judged to be more desirable as their perceived likelihood increased.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
T. D. Wilson, T. P. Wheatley, J. L. Kurtz, E. W. Dunn, and D. T. Gilbert
When to Fire: Anticipatory Versus Postevent Reconstrual of Uncontrollable Events
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2004; 30(3): 340 - 351.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory and Research in EducationHome page
M. Levinson
The Language of Race
Theory and Research in Education, November 1, 2003; 1(3): 267 - 281.
[Abstract] [PDF]