Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SPSP Annual Meeting 2010

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eiser, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Prescott, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eiser, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Prescott, T. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Connectionist Simulation of Attitude Learning: Asymmetries in the Acquisition of Positive and Negative Evaluations

J. Richard Eiser

University of Sheffield, j.r.eiser{at}shef.ac.uk

Russell H. Fazio

Ohio State University

Tom Stafford

University of Sheffield

Tony J. Prescott

University of Sheffield

Connectionist computer simulation was employed to explore the notion that, if attitudes guide approach and avoidance behaviors, false negative beliefs are likely to remain uncorrected for longer than false positive beliefs. In Study 1, the authors trained a three-layer neural network to discriminate "good" and "bad" inputs distributed across a two-dimensional space. "Full feedback" training, whereby connection weights were modified to reduce error after every trial, resulted in perfect discrimination. "Contingent feedback," whereby connection weights were only updated following outputs representing approach behavior, led to several false negative errors (good inputs misclassified as bad). In Study 2, the network was redesigned to distinguish a system for learning evaluations from a mechanism for selecting actions. Biasing action selection toward approach eliminated the asymmetry between learning of good and bad inputs under contingent feedback. Implications for various attitudinal phenomena and biases in social cognition are discussed.

Key Words: attitude • connectionism • learning • simulation

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 29, No. 10, 1221-1235 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167203254605
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Soc Cogn Affect NeurosciHome page
M. Van Duynslaeger, F. Van Overwalle, and E. Verstraeten
Electrophysiological time course and brain areas of spontaneous and intentional trait inferences
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, September 1, 2007; 2(3): 174 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
F. Van Overwalle and F. Siebler
A Connectionist Model of Attitude Formation and Change
Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2005; 9(3): 231 - 274.
[Abstract] [PDF]