Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SPSP Annual Meeting 2010

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunn, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, D. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dunn, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, D. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Location, Location, Location: The Misprediction of Satisfaction in Housing Lotteries

Elizabeth W. Dunn

University of Virginia, edunn{at}post.harvard.edu

Timothy D. Wilson

University of Virginia

Daniel T. Gilbert

Harvard University

People tend to overestimate the emotional consequences of future life events, exhibiting an impact bias. The authors replicated the impact bias in a real-life context in which undergraduates were randomly assigned to dormitories (or "houses"). Participants appeared to focus on the wrong factors when imagining their future happiness in the houses. They placed far greater weight on highly variable physical features than on less variable social features in predicting their future happiness in each house, despite accurately recognizing that social features were more important than physical features when asked explicitly about the determinants of happiness. In Experiment 2, we found that this discrepancy emerged in part because participants exhibited an isolation effect, focusing too much on factors that distinguished between houses and not enough on factors that varied only slightly, such as social features.

Key Words: affective forecasting • impact bias • predictors of happiness • emotion • isolation effect

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 29, No. 11, 1421-1432 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167203256867


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
D. T. Gilbert, M. A. Killingsworth, R. N. Eyre, and T. D. Wilson
The Surprising Power of Neighborly Advice
Science, March 20, 2009; 323(5921): 1617 - 1619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
K. Kawakami, E. Dunn, F. Karmali, and J. F. Dovidio
Mispredicting Affective and Behavioral Responses to Racism
Science, January 9, 2009; 323(5911): 276 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. Finkenauer, M. Gallucci, W. W. van Dijk, and M. Pollmann
Investigating the Role of Time in Affective Forecasting: Temporal Influences on Forecasting Accuracy
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2007; 33(8): 1152 - 1166.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
R. F. Baumeister, K. D. Vohs, C. Nathan DeWall, and Liqing Zhang
How Emotion Shapes Behavior: Feedback, Anticipation, and Reflection, Rather Than Direct Causation
Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 2007; 11(2): 167 - 203.
[Abstract] [PDF]