Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morling, B.
Right arrow Articles by Miyamoto, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morling, B.
Right arrow Articles by Miyamoto, Y.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Pregnancy
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American and Japanese Women Use Different Coping Strategies During Normal Pregnancy

Beth Morling

Muhlenberg College, morling{at}psych.udel.edu

Shinobu Kitayama

University of Michigan, kitayama{at}umich.edu

Yuri Miyamoto

University of Michigan

In this longitudinal study, pregnant women in Japan and the United States reported on three coping strategies. Two are individually phrased: personal influence over outcomes and acceptance of outcomes. The third, social assurance, is grounded in relationships, noting that close others can influence outcomes. A European American sample rated acceptance highest as a strategy, whereas Japanese women rated social assurance highest. For Americans, acceptance correlated with better pregnancy outcomes (less distress over time, better prenatal care, and less weight gain). For Japanese women, social assurance predicted a more positive maternal relationship. Acceptance correlated with less Time 1 distress in both samples. Surprisingly, personal influence generally did not predict positive outcomes in either sample, perhaps because normal pregnancy is a time-limited event with a positive prognosis. The findings are consistent with the view that well-being is related to individual variables in the United States but also to features of social relationships in Japan.

Key Words: culture • health • pregnancy • primary control • secondary control • longitudinal study • Japan • United States

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 29, No. 12, 1533-1546 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167203256878


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
H. S. Kim, D. K. Sherman, D. Ko, and S. E. Taylor
Pursuit of Comfort and Pursuit of Harmony: Culture, Relationships, and Social Support Seeking
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2006; 32(12): 1595 - 1607.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
D. Matsumoto
Are Cultural Differences in Emotion Regulation Mediated by Personality Traits?
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, July 1, 2006; 37(4): 421 - 437.
[Abstract] [PDF]