Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldenberg, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dunnam, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldenberg, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dunnam, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Gender-Typical Responses to Sexual and Emotional Infidelity as a Function of Mortality Salience Induced Self-Esteem Striving

Jamie L. Goldenberg

University of California, Davis, jgolden{at}ucdavis.edu

Mark J. Landau

University of Colorado at Colorado Springs

Tom Pyszczynski

University of Colorado at Colorado Springs

Cathy R. Cox

University of Colorado at Colorado Springs

Jeff Greenberg

University of Arizona

Sheldon Solomon

Skidmore College

Heather Dunnam

Boise State University

The authors propose that gender-differentiated patterns of jealousy in response to sexual and emotional infidelity are engendered by the differential impact of each event on self-esteem for men and women. Study 1 demonstrated that men derive relatively more self-esteem from their sexlives, whereas women’s self-esteem is more contingent on romantic commitment. Based on terror management theory, it is predicted that if gender-differentiated responses to infidelity are motivated by gender-specific contingencies for self-esteem, they should be intensified following reminders of mortality. In Study 2, mortality salience (MS) increased distress in response to sexual infidelity for men and emotional infidelity for women. Study 3 demonstrated that following MS, men who place high value on sexin romantic relationships exhibited greater distress in response to sexual infidelity, but low-ex-value men’s distress was attenuated. The authors discuss the implications for evolutionary and self-esteem-based accounts of jealousy as well as possible integration of these perspectives.

Key Words: terror management theory • gender-differentiated jealousy • evolution • self-esteem

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 29, No. 12, 1585-1595 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167203256880


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. R. Lam, K. Rios Morrison, and D. Smeesters
Gender, Intimacy, and Risky Sex: A Terror Management Account
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2009; 35(8): 1046 - 1056.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Family JournalHome page
S. H. Eaves and M. Robertson-Smith
The Relationship Between Self-Worth and Marital Infidelity: A Pilot Study
The Family Journal, October 1, 2007; 15(4): 382 - 386.
[Abstract] [PDF]