Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Das, E. H. H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Stroebe, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Das, E. H. H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Stroebe, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 29, No. 5, 650-664 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167203029005009
© 2003 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Fear Appeals Motivate Acceptance of Action Recommendations: Evidence for a Positive Bias in the Processing of Persuasive Messages

Enny H. H. J. Das

Free University, Amsterdam

John B. F. de Wit

Utrecht University

Wolfgang Stroebe

Utrecht University

Three experiments are reported that tested the hypothesis that the use of fear appeals in health persuasion may lead to positively biased systematic processing of a subsequent action recommendation aimed at reducing the health threat and, consequently, to more persuasion, regardless of the quality of the arguments in the recommendation. The levels of participants' vulnerability to as well as the severity of a health risk were varied independently, followed by a manipulation of the quality of the arguments in the subsequent action recommendation. The dependent variables included measures of persuasion (attitude, intention, and action), negative affect, and cognitive responses. The results show that participants who felt vulnerable to the health threat were more persuaded, experienced more negative emotions, and had more favorable cognitive responses. Both negative emotions concerning one's vulnerability and positive thoughts concerning the recommendation mediated the effects of vulnerability on persuasion.

Key Words: fear appeal • vulnerability • severity • behavior change • persuasion • biased processing


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Marketing TheoryHome page
M. Cismaru and A. M. Lavack
Interaction effects and combinatorial rules governing Protection Motivation Theory variables: a new model
Marketing Theory, September 1, 2007; 7(3): 249 - 270.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
N. de Hoog, W. Stroebe, and J. B. F. de Wit
The Impact of Fear Appeals on Processing and Acceptance of Action Recommendations
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2005; 31(1): 24 - 33.
[Abstract] [PDF]