Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SPSP Annual Meeting 2010

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Leeuwen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Ellemers, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Leeuwen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Ellemers, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Continuing and Changing Group Identities: The Effects of Merging on Social Identification and Ingroup Bias

Esther van Leeuwen

Free University of Amsterdam

Daan van Knippenberg

Erasmus University Rotterdam

Naomi Ellemers

Leiden University

A social identity approach to the investigation of group-based reactions to a merger is outlined, in which a merger is analyzed in terms of the continuation or change of the pre-merger group identity. In two experiments, the relationship between pre-merger identification, post-merger identification, and ingroup bias was investigated using a minimal group paradigm. Results from both studies showed that the perceived continuation of the premerger group identity in the post-merger group strengthened the positive relationship between pre-merger identification and identification with the superordinate post-merger group. Moreover, perceived continuation strengthened, rather than reduced, ingroup bias at the subordinate level of the merged groups. Some theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Key Words: changing group identity • merger • social identification • ingroup bias

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 29, No. 6, 679-690 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167203029006001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
B. E. Ashforth, S. H. Harrison, and K. G. Corley
Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions
Journal of Management, June 1, 2008; 34(3): 325 - 374.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Information ScienceHome page
A. Willem, H. Scarbrough, and M. Buelens
Impact of coherent versus multiple identities on knowledge integration
Journal of Information Science, June 1, 2008; 34(3): 370 - 386.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
C. E. Amiot, R. de la Sablonniere, D. J. Terry, and J. R. Smith
Integration of Social Identities in the Self: Toward a Cognitive-Developmental Model
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2007; 11(4): 364 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
F. Boen, N. Vanbeselaere, and M. Cool
Group Status as a Determinant of Organizational Identification After a Takeover: A Social Identity Perspective
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2006; 9(4): 547 - 560.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
F. Sani
When Subgroups Secede: Extending and Refining the Social Psychological Model of Schism in Groups
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2005; 31(8): 1074 - 1086.
[Abstract] [PDF]