Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Swap, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Swap, W. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 3, No. 2, 248-251 (1977)
DOI: 10.1177/014616727700300219
© 1977 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Interpersonal Attraction and Repeated Exposure to Rewarders and Punishers

Walter C. Swap

Tufts University

An experiment was conducted in an effort to clarify the nature of the relationship between frequency of exposure and interpersonal at traction. Subjects were visually exposed to one another during each trial of a modified prisoner's dilemma game in which subjects' out comes were controlled by the experimenter. The frequency of these visual encounters was varied, as was the nature of the monetary outcomes from the gaming trials (rewards vs. punishments) and the attribution of re sponsibility for these outcomes (partners responsible vs. non-responsi ble). Measures of attraction indicated that, overall, more frequently viewed others were preferred to those less frequently seen. This ex posure effect was most strongly obtained when the other subjects were viewed as personally responsible for delivering rewards, while either no effect or a weak negative exposure effect was found in the responsible- punish condition.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
R. Reber, N. Schwarz, and P. Winkielman
Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience?
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2004; 8(4): 364 - 382.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
J. T. Cacioppo, W. L. Gardner, and G. G. Berntson
Beyond Bipolar Conceptualizations and Measures: The Case of Attitudes and Evaluative Space
Personality and Social Psychology Review, January 1, 1997; 1(1): 3 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]