Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kassin, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kassin, S. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 3, No. 4, 616-619 (1977)
DOI: 10.1177/014616727700300411

On The Use of Consensus: Prediction, Attribution and Evaluation

Charles A. Lowe

University of Connecticut

Saul M. Kassin

University of Connecticut

Subjects read about a psychology experiment on helping be havior. Consensus information was manipulated by presenting base rates for experimental helping behavior (high, low, or no base rate information) and by altering the described situation such that helping behavior was more or less expected of participants (high, medium, low or no implicit consensus). Base rate information influenced predic tions more than did implicit consensus information. However, implicit consensus but not base rates influenced causal attributions for non- helping behavior and evaluations of non-helpers. Implications of these results for the recent dispute concerning observers' use of consensus information were discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?