|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Criticizing Groups from the Inside and the Outside: An Identity Perspective on the Intergroup Sensitivity Effect
Matthew J. Hornsey
Armin Imani
University of Queensland
Research on group criticism has demonstrated that criticisms are received less defensively when made by an ingroup member than when made by an outsider (the intergroup sensitivity effect). Three experiments tested the extent to which this effect is driven by social identity concerns or by judgments of how experienced the source of the criticism is. In Experiments 1 and 2, Australians who criticized Australia (ingroup critics) were met with less defensiveness than were foreigners who criticized Australia (outgroup critics), regardless of the amount of experience the foreigner had with Australia. Furthermore, the effects of speaker type on evaluations were mediated by perceptions of the extent to which the criticisms were intended to be constructive but not by perceptions of experience. Finally, Experiment 3 indicated that although experience does not help outgroup critics, a lack of experience can hurt ingroup critics. Recommendations are provided as to how people can reduce defensiveness when making group criticisms.
Key Words: criticism intergroup relations intergroup sensitivity effect
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 30, No. 3,
365-383 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167203261295

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Hopman and E. van Leeuwen
Who Do We Inform? The Role of Status and Target in Intergroup Whistle-blowing
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
September 1, 2009;
12(5):
605 - 618.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Packer
On Being Both With Us and Against Us: A Normative Conflict Model of Dissent in Social Groups
Personality and Social Psychology Review,
February 1, 2008;
12(1):
50 - 72.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Hornsey, T. Grice, J. Jetten, N. Paulsen, and V. Callan
Group-Directed Criticisms and Recommendations for Change: Why Newcomers Arouse More Resistance Than Old-Timers
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
July 1, 2007;
33(7):
1036 - 1048.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Ariyanto, M. J. Hornsey, and C. Gallois
Group Allegiances and Perceptions of Media Bias: Taking Into Account Both the Perceiver and the Source
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
April 1, 2007;
10(2):
266 - 279.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Klein, R. Spears, and S. Reicher
Social Identity Performance: Extending the Strategic Side of SIDE
Personality and Social Psychology Review,
February 1, 2007;
11(1):
28 - 45.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Sutton, T. J. Elder, and K. M. Douglas
Reactions to Internal and External Criticism of Outgroups: Social Convention in the Intergroup Sensitivity Effect
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
May 1, 2006;
32(5):
563 - 575.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Reid and H. Giles
Intergroup Relations: Its Linguistic and Communicative Parameters
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
July 1, 2005;
8(3):
211 - 214.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. J. Elder, R. M. Sutton, and K. M. Douglas
Keeping it to Ourselves: Effects of Audience Size and Composition on Reactions to Criticisms of the Ingroup
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
July 1, 2005;
8(3):
231 - 244.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|