Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Epley, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gilovich, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Epley, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gilovich, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Are Adjustments Insufficient?

Nicholas Epley

Harvard University, epley{at}wjh.harvard.edu

Thomas Gilovich

Cornell University

Many judgmental biases are thought to be the product of insufficient adjustment from an initial anchor value. Nearly all existing evidence of insufficient adjustment, however, comes from an experimental paradigm that evidence indicates does not involve adjustment at all. In this article, the authors first provide further evidence that some kinds of anchors (those that are self-generated and known to be incorrect but close to the correct answer) activate processes of adjustment, whereas others (uncertain anchors provided by an external source) do not. It is then shown that adjustment from self-generated anchors does indeed tend to be insufficient, both by comparing the estimates of participants starting from different anchor values and by comparing estimates with actual answers. Thus, evidence is provided of adjustment-based anchoring effects similar to the accessibility-based anchoring effects observed in the traditional anchoring paradigm, supporting theories of social judgment that rely on mechanisms of insufficient adjustment.

Key Words: anchoring • heuristics • biases • insufficient adjustment • judgment and decision making • social judgment

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 30, No. 4, 447-460 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167203261889


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
G. S. Preuss and M. D. Alicke
Everybody Loves Me: Self-Evaluations and Metaperceptions of Dating Popularity
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2009; 35(7): 937 - 950.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
B. B. Johnson and C. Chess
Evaluating Public Responses to Environmental Trend Indicators
Science Communication, September 1, 2006; 28(1): 64 - 92.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
F. E. Frey and L. R. Tropp
Being Seen As Individuals Versus As Group Members: Extending Research on Metaperception to Intergroup Contexts
Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2006; 10(3): 265 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]