This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sheldon, K. M. Articles by Kasser, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sheldon, K. M. Articles by Kasser, T. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Mental Health Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Independent Effects of Goal Contents and Motives on Well-Being: It’s Both What You Pursue and Why You Pursue It

University of Missouri-Columbia, sheldonk{at}missouri.edu

Richard M. Ryan

University of Rochester

Edward L. Deci

University of Rochester

Tim Kasser

Knox College

The assertion that both the content of goals and the motives behind goals affect psychological well-being has been controversial. Three studies examined this issue directly, showing that both what goals people pursue (i.e., whether they strive for extrinsic vs. intrinsic goal contents) and why people pursue them (i.e., whether they strive for autonomous vs. controlled motives) make significant independent contributions to psychological well-being. The pattern emerged in between-person and within-person studies of cross-sectional well-being and also emerged in a year-long study of prospective change in well-being. Implications for prescriptive theories of happiness are discussed.

Key Words: extrinsic goals • autonomous motivation • subjective well-being

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 30, No. 4, 475-486 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167203261883


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Weinstein, A. K. Przybylski, and R. M. Ryan Can Nature Make Us More Caring? Effects of Immersion in Nature on Intrinsic Aspirations and Generosity Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2009; 35(10): 1315 - 1329. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Banerjee and H. Dittmar Individual Differences in Children's Materialism: The Role of Peer Relations Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2008; 34(1): 17 - 31. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. L. B. Lykins, S. C. Segerstrom, A. J. Averill, D. R. Evans, and M. E. Kemeny Goal Shifts Following Reminders of Mortality: Reconciling Posttraumatic Growth and Terror Management Theory Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2007; 33(8): 1088 - 1099. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. M. Sheldon and L. S. Krieger Understanding the Negative Effects of Legal Education on Law Students: A Longitudinal Test of Self-Determination Theory Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 2007; 33(6): 883 - 897. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Gillison, M Standage, and S. Skevington Relationships among adolescents' weight perceptions, exercise goals, exercise motivation, quality of life and leisure-time exercise behaviour: a self-determination theory approach Health Educ. Res., December 1, 2006; 21(6): 836 - 847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Czuchry, T. L. Sia, and D. F. Dansereau Improving Early Engagement and Treatment Readiness of Probationers: Gender Differences The Prison Journal, March 1, 2006; 86(1): 56 - 74. [Abstract] [PDF]