Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rucker, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rucker, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, A. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 30, No. 6, 673-684 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167203262849
© 2004 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Jounal Article

On the Assignment of Punishment: The Impact of General-Societal Threat and the Moderating Role of Severity

Derek D. Rucker

The Ohio State University, rucker.46{at}osu.edu

Mark Polifroni

The Ohio State University

Philip E. Tetlock

University of California, Berkeley

Amanda L. Scott

The Ohio State University

This article reports experiments assessing how general threats to social order and severity of a crime can influence punitiveness. Results consistently showed that when participants feel that the social order is threatened, they behave more punitively toward a crime perpetrator, but only when severity associated with a crime was relatively moderate. Evidence is presented to suggest that people can correct—at least to a degree—for the "biasing" influence of these inductions. Finally, threats to social order appear to increase punitiveness by arousing a retributive desire to see individuals pay for what they have done, as opposed to a purely utilitarian desire to deter future wrongdoing. The authors suggest that individuals sometimes act as intuitive prosecutors when ascribing punishment to an individual transgressor based on their perception of general societal control efficacy.

Key Words: punishment • attribution


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. Stouten, D. De Cremer, and E. van Dijk
Violating Equality in Social Dilemmas: Emotional and Retributive Reactions as a Function of Trust, Attribution, and Honesty
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2006; 32(7): 894 - 906.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J.-W. van Prooijen
Retributive Reactions to Suspected Offenders: The Importance of Social Categorizations and Guilt Probability
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 2006; 32(6): 715 - 726.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. M. Sutton, T. J. Elder, and K. M. Douglas
Reactions to Internal and External Criticism of Outgroups: Social Convention in the Intergroup Sensitivity Effect
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2006; 32(5): 563 - 575.
[Abstract] [PDF]