| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Group-Based Self-Evaluation Outside of the Laboratory: Effects of Global Versus Contextual StatusSan Diego State University
Montana State University
Michigan State University An event-contingent diary methodology was used to study the impact of intergroup and intragroup factors on self-evaluations in naturally occurring groups. Participants reported their contextual group status, group identification, and self-evaluations each time they self-categorized as a group member throughout a 1- week period. Indicators of global group status, interdependence, and permeability of group boundaries also were obtained. Multilevel modeling revealed that contextual status and global status interacted to predict self-evaluations. Contextual status had a stronger relationship with self-evaluations for members of global low-status groups than for members of high-status groups. Analyses of intragroup factors revealed that greater group interdependence but not permeability of group boundaries also was associated with higher self-evaluations. The effects of both contextual status and group interdependence were mediated by group identification.
Key Words: status social identity self-esteem diary interdependence
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 30, No. 8,
985-994 (2004) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||

