| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/0146167204264004 The Name of the Game: Predictive Power of Reputations versus Situational Labels in Determining Prisoners Dilemma Game MovesThe Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya, Israel
U.S. Air Force Academy
Stanford University, ross{at}psych.stan-ford.edu Two experiments, one conducted with American college students and one with Israeli pilots and their instructors, explored the predictive power of reputation-based assessments versus the stated "name of the game" (Wall Street Game vs. Community Game) in determining players responses in an N-move Prisoners Dilemma. The results of these studies showed that the relevant labeling manipulations exerted far greater impact on the players choice to cooperate versus defectboth in the first round and overallthan anticipated by the individuals who had predicted their behavior. Reputation-based prediction, by contrast, failed to discriminate cooperators from defectors. A supplementary questionnaire study showed the generality of the relevant short-coming in naïve psychology. The implications of these findings, and the potential contribution of the present methodology to the classic pedagogical strategy of the demonstration experiment, are discussed.
Key Words: Prisoners Dilemma lay psychology name of the game construal demonstration experiments
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



