|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 31, No. 1,
87-98 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167204271308
© 2005 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
The Interplay Between Goal Intentions and Implementation Intentions
Paschal Sheeran
University of Sheffield, p.sheeran{at}sheffield.ac.uk
Thomas L. Webb
University of Sheffield
Peter M. Gollwitzer
Universität Konstanz and New York University
Two studies tested whether action control by implementation intentions is sensitive to the activation and strength of participants underlying goal intentions. In Study 1, participants formed implementation intentions (or did not) and their goal intentions were measured. Findings revealed a significant interaction between implementation intentions and the strength of respective goal intentions. Implementation intentions benefited the rate of goal attainment when participants had strong goal intentions but not when goal intentions were weak. Study 2 activated either a task-relevant or a neutral goal outside of participants conscious awareness and found that implementation intentions affected performance only when the relevant goal had been activated. These findings indicate that the rate of goal attainment engendered by implementation intentions takes account of the state (strength, activation) of peoples superordinate goal intentions.
Key Words: implementation intentions goals automatic self-control

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. S. Casper
Using Implementation Intentions to Teach Practitioners: Changing Practice Behaviors via Continuing Education
Psychiatr Serv,
July 1, 2008;
59(7):
747 - 752.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Epstude and N. J. Roese
The Functional Theory of Counterfactual Thinking
Personality and Social Psychology Review,
May 1, 2008;
12(2):
168 - 192.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Achtziger, P. M. Gollwitzer, and P. Sheeran
Implementation Intentions and Shielding Goal Striving From Unwanted Thoughts and Feelings
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
March 1, 2008;
34(3):
381 - 393.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Schuz, F. F. Sniehotta, N. Mallach, A. U. Wiedemann, and R. Schwarzer
Predicting transitions from preintentional, intentional and actional stages of change
Health Educ. Res.,
January 31, 2008;
(2008)
cym092v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Luszczynska, M. Tryburcy, and R. Schwarzer
Improving fruit and vegetable consumption: a self-efficacy intervention compared with a combined self-efficacy and planning intervention
Health Educ. Res.,
October 1, 2007;
22(5):
630 - 638.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. B. Perkins, P. S. Jensen, J. Jaccard, P. Gollwitzer, G. Oettingen, E. Pappadopulos, and K. E. Hoagwood
Applying Theory-Driven Approaches to Understanding and Modifying Clinicians' Behavior: What Do We Know?
Psychiatr Serv,
March 1, 2007;
58(3):
342 - 348.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Koestner, E. J. Horberg, P. Gaudreau, T. Powers, P. Di Dio, C. Bryan, R. Jochum, and N. Salter
Bolstering implementation plans for the long haul: the benefits of simultaneously boosting self-concordance or self-efficacy.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
November 1, 2006;
32(11):
1547 - 1558.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|