Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McFarland, S. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McFarland, S. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

On the Eve of War: Authoritarianism, Social Dominance, and American Students’ Attitudes Toward Attacking Iraq

Sam G. McFarland

Western Kentucky University, sam.mcfarland{at}wku

In the week before the 2003 American attack on Iraq, the effects of authoritarianism and the social dominance orientation on support for the attack were examined. Based on prior research on the nature of these constructs, a structural model was developed and tested. As predicted, authoritarianism strengthened support for the attack by intensifying the perception that Iraq threatened America. Social dominance increased support by reducing concern for the likely human costs of the war. Both also increased blind patriotism, which in turn reduced concern for the war’s human costs and was reciprocally related to the belief that Iraq threatened America.

Key Words: authoritarianism • social dominance • patriotism • war • threat

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 31, No. 3, 360-367 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167204271596


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
T. Carnahan and S. McFarland
Revisiting the Stanford Prison Experiment: Could Participant Self-Selection Have Led to the Cruelty?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2007; 33(5): 603 - 614.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
P. Liberman
Punitiveness and U.S. Elite Support for the 1991 Persian Gulf War
Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 2007; 51(1): 3 - 32.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
N. Halevy, L. Sagiv, S. Roccas, and G. Bornstein
Perceiving Intergroup Conflict: From Game Models to Mental Templates
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2006; 32(12): 1674 - 1689.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. C. Cohrs, B. Moschner, J. Maes, and S. Kielmann
The Motivational Bases of Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation: Relations to Values and Attitudes in the Aftermath of September 11, 2001
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2005; 31(10): 1425 - 1434.
[Abstract] [PDF]