|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Social Identity Complexity and Outgroup Tolerance
Marilynn B. Brewer
Ohio State University, brewer.64{at}osu.edu
Kathleen P. Pierce
Ohio State University
Social identity complexity refers to the way in which individuals subjectively represent the relationships among their multiple ingroup memberships. More specifically, individuals with low social identity complexity see their ingroups as highly overlapping and convergent, whereas those with high complexity see their different ingroups as distinct and cross-cutting membership groups. The present study tested the hypothesis that perceived overlap among ingroup memberships would be negatively related to ingroup inclusiveness and tolerance for outgroups, such that individuals with high overlap (low complexity) would be less tolerant and accepting of outgroups in general than those with low overlap (high complexity). Results from a telephone interview survey of adult residents of the state of Ohio supported this hypothesis. Individual differences in complexity of perception of their national, religious, occupational, political, and recreational social identities were systematically related to their attitudes toward ethnic outgroups and diversity.
Key Words: multiple social identities group membership ingroup inclusiveness tolerance outgroup attitudes
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 31, No. 3,
428-437 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167204271710

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Schmid, M. Hewstone, N. Tausch, E. Cairns, and J. Hughes
Antecedents and Consequences of Social Identity Complexity: Intergroup Contact, Distinctiveness Threat, and Outgroup Attitudes
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
August 1, 2009;
35(8):
1085 - 1098.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. P. Miller, M. B. Brewer, and N. L. Arbuckle
Social Identity Complexity: Its Correlates and Antecedents
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
January 1, 2009;
12(1):
79 - 94.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Hargie, D. Dickson, J. Mallett, and M. Stringer
Communicating Social Identity: A Study of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland
Communication Research,
December 1, 2008;
35(6):
792 - 821.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. E. Ashforth, S. H. Harrison, and K. G. Corley
Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions
Journal of Management,
June 1, 2008;
34(3):
325 - 374.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. D. Livingston and L. Sinclair
Taking the Watchdog Off Its Leash: Personal Prejudices and Situational Motivations Jointly Predict Derogation of a Stigmatized Source
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
February 1, 2008;
34(2):
210 - 223.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. B. Thatcher and L. L. Greer
Does It Really Matter If You Recognize Who I Am? The Implications of Identity Comprehension for Individuals in Work Teams{dagger}
Journal of Management,
February 1, 2008;
34(1):
5 - 24.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Adil Saribay and S. M. Andersen
Relational to Collective: Significant-Other Representations, Ethnic Categories, and Intergroup Perceptions
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
December 1, 2007;
33(12):
1714 - 1726.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. E. Amiot, R. de la Sablonniere, D. J. Terry, and J. R. Smith
Integration of Social Identities in the Self: Toward a Cognitive-Developmental Model
Personality and Social Psychology Review,
November 1, 2007;
11(4):
364 - 388.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Verkuyten
Religious Group Identification and Inter-Religious Relations: A Study Among Turkish-Dutch Muslims
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
July 1, 2007;
10(3):
341 - 357.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Medvene, K. Grosch, and N. Swink
Interpersonal Complexity: A Cognitive Component of Person-Centered Care
Gerontologist,
April 1, 2006;
46(2):
220 - 226.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|