Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SPSP Annual Meeting 2010

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brewer, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Pierce, K. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brewer, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Pierce, K. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Social Identity Complexity and Outgroup Tolerance

Marilynn B. Brewer

Ohio State University, brewer.64{at}osu.edu

Kathleen P. Pierce

Ohio State University

Social identity complexity refers to the way in which individuals subjectively represent the relationships among their multiple ingroup memberships. More specifically, individuals with low social identity complexity see their ingroups as highly overlapping and convergent, whereas those with high complexity see their different ingroups as distinct and cross-cutting membership groups. The present study tested the hypothesis that perceived overlap among ingroup memberships would be negatively related to ingroup inclusiveness and tolerance for outgroups, such that individuals with high overlap (low complexity) would be less tolerant and accepting of outgroups in general than those with low overlap (high complexity). Results from a telephone interview survey of adult residents of the state of Ohio supported this hypothesis. Individual differences in complexity of perception of their national, religious, occupational, political, and recreational social identities were systematically related to their attitudes toward ethnic outgroups and diversity.

Key Words: multiple social identities • group membership • ingroup inclusiveness • tolerance • outgroup attitudes

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 31, No. 3, 428-437 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167204271710


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
K. Schmid, M. Hewstone, N. Tausch, E. Cairns, and J. Hughes
Antecedents and Consequences of Social Identity Complexity: Intergroup Contact, Distinctiveness Threat, and Outgroup Attitudes
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2009; 35(8): 1085 - 1098.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
K. P. Miller, M. B. Brewer, and N. L. Arbuckle
Social Identity Complexity: Its Correlates and Antecedents
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 2009; 12(1): 79 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
O. Hargie, D. Dickson, J. Mallett, and M. Stringer
Communicating Social Identity: A Study of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland
Communication Research, December 1, 2008; 35(6): 792 - 821.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
B. E. Ashforth, S. H. Harrison, and K. G. Corley
Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions
Journal of Management, June 1, 2008; 34(3): 325 - 374.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. D. Livingston and L. Sinclair
Taking the Watchdog Off Its Leash: Personal Prejudices and Situational Motivations Jointly Predict Derogation of a Stigmatized Source
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 2008; 34(2): 210 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
S. M. B. Thatcher and L. L. Greer
Does It Really Matter If You Recognize Who I Am? The Implications of Identity Comprehension for Individuals in Work Teams{dagger}
Journal of Management, February 1, 2008; 34(1): 5 - 24.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. Adil Saribay and S. M. Andersen
Relational to Collective: Significant-Other Representations, Ethnic Categories, and Intergroup Perceptions
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2007; 33(12): 1714 - 1726.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
C. E. Amiot, R. de la Sablonniere, D. J. Terry, and J. R. Smith
Integration of Social Identities in the Self: Toward a Cognitive-Developmental Model
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2007; 11(4): 364 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
M. Verkuyten
Religious Group Identification and Inter-Religious Relations: A Study Among Turkish-Dutch Muslims
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2007; 10(3): 341 - 357.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
L. Medvene, K. Grosch, and N. Swink
Interpersonal Complexity: A Cognitive Component of Person-Centered Care
Gerontologist, April 1, 2006; 46(2): 220 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]