Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (26)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Powell, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schmitt, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Powell, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schmitt, M. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Inequality as Ingroup Privilege or Outgroup Disadvantage: The Impact of Group Focus on Collective Guilt and Interracial Attitudes

Adam A. Powell

University of Kansas, aapowell{at}ku.edu

Nyla R. Branscombe

University of Kansas, nyla{at}ku.edu

Michael T. Schmitt

Purdue University

Among members of privileged groups, social inequality is often thought of in terms of the disadvantages associated with outgroup membership. Yet inequality also can be validly framed in terms of ingroup privilege. These different framings have important psychological and social implications. In Experiment 1 (N = 110), White American participants assessed 24 statements about racial inequality framed as either White privileges or Black disadvantages. In Experiment 2 (N = 122), White participants generated examples of White privileges or Black disadvantages. In both experiments, a White privilege framing resulted in greater collective guilt and lower racism compared to a Black disadvantage framing. Collective guilt mediated the manipulation’s effect on racism. In addition, in Experiment 2, a White privilege framing decreased White racial identification compared to a Black disadvantage framing. These findings suggest that representing inequality in terms of outgroup disadvantage allows privileged group members to avoid the negative psychological implications of inequality and supports prejudicial attitudes.

Key Words: racial inequality • collective guilt • White privilege • White identification • prejudice

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 31, No. 4, 508-521 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167204271713


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
K. Kahn, A. K. Ho, J. Sidanius, and F. Pratto
The Space between Us and Them: Perceptions of Status Differences
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, September 1, 2009; 12(5): 591 - 604.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
L. T. O'Brien, A. Blodorn, A. Alsbrooks, R. Dube, G. Adams, and J. C. Nelson
Understanding White Americans' Perceptions of Racism in Hurricane Katrina-Related Events
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2009; 12(4): 431 - 444.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
M. T. Schmitt, D. A. Miller, N. R. Branscombe, and J. W. Brehm
The Difficulty of Making Reparations Affects the Intensity of Collective Guilt
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2008; 11(3): 267 - 279.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
T. Saguy, J. F. Dovidio, and F. Pratto
Beyond Contact: Intergroup Contact in the Context of Power Relations
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2008; 34(3): 432 - 445.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
N. S. Harth, T. Kessler, and C. W. Leach
Advantaged Group's Emotional Reactions to Intergroup Inequality: The Dynamics of Pride, Guilt, and Sympathy
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2008; 34(1): 115 - 129.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
B. S. Lowery, E. D. Knowles, and M. M. Unzueta
Framing Inequity Safely: Whites' Motivated Perceptions of Racial Privilege
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2007; 33(9): 1237 - 1250.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
G. Adams and P. S. Salter
Health Psychology in African Settings: A Cultural-psychological Analysis
J Health Psychol, May 1, 2007; 12(3): 539 - 551.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
A. T. Maitner, D. M. Mackie, and E. R. Smith
Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction and Guilt Following Ingroup Aggression
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 2007; 10(2): 223 - 237.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. W. Leach, A. Iyer, and A. Pedersen
Anger and Guilt About Ingroup Advantage Explain the Willingness for Political Action
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2006; 32(9): 1232 - 1245.
[Abstract] [PDF]