Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SPSP Annual Meeting 2010

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Galinsky, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Mussweiler, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Galinsky, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Mussweiler, T.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Family Issues
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Regulatory Focus at the Bargaining Table: Promoting Distributive and Integrative Success

Adam D. Galinsky

Northwestern University, agalinsky{at}northwestern.edu

Geoffrey J. Leonardelli

University of Toronto

Gerardo A. Okhuysen

University of Utah

Thomas Mussweiler

University of Cologne

The authors demonstrate that in dyadic negotiations, negotiators with a promotion regulatory focus achieve superior outcomes than negotiators with prevention regulatory focus in two ways. First, a promotion focus leads negotiators to claim more resources at the bargaining table. In the first two studies, promotion-focused negotiators paid more attention to their target prices(i.e., their ideal outcomes) and achieved more advantageous distributive outcomes than did prevention-focused negotiators. The second study also reveals an important mediating process: Negotiators with a promotion focus made more extreme opening offers in their favor. Second, a promotion focus leads negotiators to create more resources at the bargaining table that benefit both parties. A third study demonstrated that in a multi-issue negotiation, a promotion focus increased the likelihood that a dyad achieved a jointly optimal or Pareto efficient outcome compared to prevention-focused dyads. The discussion focuses on the role of regulatory focus in social interaction and introduces the notion of interaction fit.

Key Words: regulatory focus • negotiations • social interaction • distributive outcomes • integrative outcomes

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 31, No. 8, 1087-1098 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167205276429


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am Law Econ RevHome page
R. Korobkin and J. Doherty
Who Wins in Settlement Negotiations?
Am. Law Econ. Rev., June 8, 2009; (2009) ahp004v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
S. Moss
Cultivating the Regulatory Focus of Followers to Amplify Their Sensitivity to Transformational Leadership
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, February 1, 2009; 15(3): 241 - 259.
[Abstract] [PDF]