| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Perceiving Intergroup Conflict: From Game Models to Mental Templates
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Open University
Hebrew University of Jerusalem This article puts forward a parsimonious framework for studying subjective perceptions of real-life intergroup conflicts. Four studies were conducted to explore how individuals perceive the strategic properties of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Studies 1 and 2 found theory-driven associations between people's subjective perception of the conflict's structure as a Chicken, Assurance, or Prisoner's Dilemma game and their ingroup/outgroup perceptions, national identification, religiosity, political partisanship, voting behavior, and right-wing authoritarianism. Studies 3 and 4 manipulated the saliency of the needs for cognitive closure and security, respectively, demonstrating that these needs affect people's endorsement of the game models as descriptions of the conflict.
Key Words: intergroup conflict mixed-motive games mental representation
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 32, No. 12,
1674-1689 (2006) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||

