This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Nadler, A. Articles by Liviatan, I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nadler, A. Articles by Liviatan, I. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Family Issues Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Intergroup Reconciliation: Effects of Adversary's Expressions of Empathy, Responsibility, and Recipients' Trust

Tel Aviv University

Ido Liviatan

New York University

The present study explores the effects of expressions of empathy for the ingroup's conflict-related suffering and assumed responsibility for causing it by a representative of the rival outgroup on recipient's willingness for reconciliation. It is suggested that such positive expressions by an adversary will have positive effects on reconciliation only in the presence of a basic level of trust in the outgroup. In two studies, Israeli-Jewish participants were exposed to a Palestinian leader who either expressed or did not express empathy and/or Palestinian responsibility for Israelis' suffering. After reading the speech, participants completed a questionnaire that measured their attitudes toward reconciliation with Palestinians. Results of both studies show that whereas expression of empathy led to more positive attitudes when trust was high, it tended to have adverse effects when trust was low. Similar effects were not found for assumed responsibility. Implications for research on intergroup conflict and reconciliation are discussed.

Key Words: intergroup reconciliation • trust • expressed empathy • acceptance of responsibility • apology

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 32, No. 4, 459-470 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167205276431


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. F. Thomas, C. McGarty, and K. I. Mavor Transforming "Apathy Into Movement":The Role of Prosocial Emotions in Motivating Action for Social Change Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2009; 13(4): 310 - 333. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Shnabel, A. Nadler, J. Ullrich, J. F. Dovidio, and D. Carmi Promoting Reconciliation Through the Satisfaction of the Emotional Needs of Victimized and Perpetrating Group Members: The Needs-Based Model of Reconciliation Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2009; 35(8): 1021 - 1030. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Maoz and C. Mccauley Threat Perceptions and Feelings as Predictors of Jewish-Israeli Support for Compromise with Palestinians Journal of Peace Research, July 1, 2009; 46(4): 525 - 539. [Abstract] [PDF]