This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Haley, H. Articles by Sidanius, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Haley, H. Articles by Sidanius, J. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Asian-American Health Hispanic-American Health Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Positive and Negative Framing of Affirmative Action: A Group Dominance Perspective

Jim Sidanius

University of California, Los Angeles

Using a sample of 328 White, Latino, and Black Los Angeles County adults, the authors examined the tendency to employ various affirmative action "frames" (e.g., affirmative action as a "tie-breaking" device or as a quota-based policy). All three groups agreed about which frames cast affirmative action in a positive light and which cast it in a negative light. Although minorities had a tendency to frame affirmative action in terms that most people find morally acceptable, Whites had a tendency to frame affirmative action in terms most people find unacceptable. In addition, compared to minorities, Whites were less supportive of affirmative action regardless of how it was framed. LISREL modeling also was employed to test two competing models regarding predictors of the tendency to use frames that one personally finds to be relatively negative versus positive. Consistent with the expectations of social dominance theory and a motivated cognition perspective, the authors found that social dominance orientation (SDO) had significant net direct and indirect effects on one's framing of affirmative action.

Key Words: affirmative action • framing effects • motivated reasoning • social dominance theory • social dominance orientation

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 32, No. 5, 656-668 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167205283442


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. B. Brodish, P. C. Brazy, and P. G. Devine More Eyes on the Prize: Variability in White Americans' Perceptions of Progress Toward Racial Equality Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 2008; 34(4): 513 - 527. [Abstract] [PDF]