Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SPSP Annual Meeting 2010

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crisp, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hewstone, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crisp, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hewstone, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Crossed Categorization in Common Ingroup Contexts

Richard J. Crisp

University of Birmingham

Judi Walsh

University of East Anglia

Miles Hewstone

University of Oxford

In three experiments, the authors tested the hypothesis that a common ingroup context would moderate evaluations of crossed category targets. In Experiment 1, the typical additive pattern of evaluation across artificial crossed category groups became a social inclusion pattern in a common ingroup context. In Experiment 2, the authors manipulated the importance of real crossed category targets. When the crossed groups were of low importance, the effects of imposing a common ingroup replicated those observed in Experiment 1. For important crossed groups, however, the additive pattern remained. In Experiment 3, the authors measured perceived importance of the crossed groups to social identity prior to introducing a common ingroup context. The effects of a common categorization on evaluations were again moderated by perceived importance. These findings are discussed in the context of integrating crossed categorization and common ingroup identity models of multiple categorization.

Key Words: crossed categorization • common ingroup identity • reducing prejudice • intergroup bias

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 32, No. 9, 1204-1218 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167206289409


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. J. Van Bavel and W. A. Cunningham
Self-Categorization With a Novel Mixed-Race Group Moderates Automatic Social and Racial Biases
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2009; 35(3): 321 - 335.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
J. F. Dovidio, S. L. Gaertner, and T. Saguy
Commonality and the Complexity of "We": Social Attitudes and Social Change
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2009; 13(1): 3 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
A. Gomez, J. F. Dovidio, C. Huici, S. L. Gaertner, and I. Cuadrado
The Other Side of We: When Outgroup Members Express Common Identity
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2008; 34(12): 1613 - 1626.
[Abstract] [PDF]