This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0146167207305856v1 33/12/1617    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Kiefer, A. K. Articles by Sanchez, D. T. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kiefer, A. K. Articles by Sanchez, D. T. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Men's Sex-Dominance Inhibition: Do Men Automatically Refrain From Sexually Dominant Behavior?

University of California, San Francisco, amy.kiefer{at}gmail.com

Diana T. Sanchez

Rutgers University

Men receive conflicting messages about their sexual roles in heterosexual relationships. Men are socialized to initiate and direct sexual activities with women; yet societal norms also proscribe the sexual domination and coercion of women. The authors test these competing hypotheses by assessing whether men inhibit the link between sex and dominance. In Studies 1a and b, using a subliminal priming procedure embedded in a lexical decision task, the authors demonstrate that men automatically suppress the concept of dominance following exposure to subliminal sex primes relative to neutral primes. In Studies 2 and 3, the authors show that men who are less likely to perceive sexual assertiveness as necessary, to refrain from dominant sexual behavior, and who do not invest in masculine gender ideals are more likely to inhibit dominant thoughts following sex primes. Implications for theories of automatic cognitive networks and gender-based sexual roles are discussed.

Key Words: implicit associations • sexual behavior • gender differences • passivity • dominance

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?