| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Understanding the Relations Between Different Forms of Racial Prejudice: A Cognitive Consistency PerspectiveUniversity of Western Ontario, bgawrons{at}uwo.ca
University of Western Ontario
University of Western Ontario
University of Würzburg Research on racial prejudice is currently characterized by the existence of diverse concepts (e.g., implicit prejudice, old-fashioned racism, modern racism, aversive racism) that are not well integrated from a general perspective. The present article proposes an integrative framework for these concepts employing a cognitive consistency perspective. Specifically, it is argued that the reliance on immediate affective reactions toward racial minority groups in evaluative judgments about these groups depends on the consistency of this evaluation with other relevant beliefs pertaining to central components of old-fashioned, modern, and aversive forms of prejudice. A central prediction of the proposed framework is that the relation between "implicit" and "explicit" prejudice should be moderated by the interaction of egalitarianism-related, nonprejudicial goals and perceptions of discrimination. This prediction was confirmed in a series of three studies. Implications for research on prejudice are discussed.
Key Words: aversive racism • cognitive consistency • implicit prejudice • modern racism • old-fashioned racism
This version was published on May
1, 2008 Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 34, No. 5,
648-665 (2008) |
|||
 |
|
|
 |
|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
