Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SPSP Annual Meeting 2010

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilder, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, V. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wilder, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, V. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Group Membership and Preference for Information about Others

David A. Wilder

Rutgers University

Vernon L. Allen

University of Wisconsin

This experiment tested the hypothesis that preference for information about persons is affected by the structure of the social environment. Subjects were either categorized into one of two competitive groups, one of two noncompetitive groups, a single group, or not assigned to a group at all. Each subject ranked his preference for seeing information concerning the similarity or dissimilarity of other persons' attitudes to his own. Subjects in the ingroup/outgroup conditions preferred information indicating similarity with the ingroup and dissimilarity with the outgroup. Subjects who were either all members of a single group or who were not categorized into a group expressed no preference regarding information about others.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 4, No. 1, 106-110 (1978)
DOI: 10.1177/014616727800400122


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
K. W. Phillips
The Effects of Categorically Based Expectations on Minority Influence: The Importance of Congruence
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2003; 29(1): 3 - 13.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. B. Brewer, H.-K. Ho, J.-Y. Lee, and N. Miller
Social Identity and Social Distance among Hong Kong Schoolchildren
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1987; 13(2): 156 - 165.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
D. A. Taylor and B. F. Moriarty
Ingroup Bias as a Function of Competition and Race
Journal of Conflict Resolution, March 1, 1987; 31(1): 192 - 199.
[Abstract]